Author: papa

Derek is a brilliant physicist.. and he also studied the history of science. Science proceeds with an exponential curve. Someday everyone will have a Phd. A singularity is coming. I have put an version on your kindle.

Brig, Soren and Reidar-

Alexei Navalny is cause of large protests in Russia. Learn about him. These protests and revolution will shortly be in France and American. The world is returning to history.

Think now …“which side will I be on?”

Brig, Soren and Reidar-

This slogan is poison.

It is obvious that they treat their citizens as small school children or slaves.

(rather than as free independent human beings). If you have a friend say this, they are dangerous to you. #bebrave. Love papa.

Boys, brig, soren and reidar

Be very cautious about having sex with women. They can destroy you as a man. If they are feeling jealous or envious, then they are the most dangerous.

Columbia University is where your mother and I met…

Be safe boys, I love you. Papa…

Columbia University continues to deny students accused of sexual assault their due process rights, going out of their way to ignore exculpatory evidence in order to find accused men responsible no matter how thin the allegations.

The latest example is Ben Feibleman, who is using his real name to fight the allegations against him, made by a woman who, as usual, gets to keep her anonymity and is only referred to as Jane Doe in court documents. The Daily Caller’s Betsy Rothstein recently published an exclusive interview with Feibleman regarding the $25 million lawsuit he filed against the university last May. I encourage you to read her full story (warning: language and graphic depictions of sex), which includes a complete transcript of the 30-minute audio recording Feibleman made of the woman when he started to suspect things might go wrong.

Columbia’s adjudicators ignored the audio recording Feibleman made and scoffed at his allegations that he was the one who was sexually assaulted. The adjudicators, according to Rothstein, told them there was “insufficient evidence” that he was assaulted (despite the audio recording) and that even if he had been assaulted, he would have liked it, therefore, Jane was “not responsible” for any alleged assault. Columbia found Feibleman responsible and retroactively expelled him and revoked his diploma (he had been allowed to graduate during the investigation).

Jane and Feibleman knew each other a little from their journalism classes. After an event (which Feibleman says wasn’t the sort of place to get wasted), Jane allegedly asked him to put his head on her lap.

“She later sneaked kisses when her friends weren’t looking. She poured beer down his throat during a drinking game. Then she asked him to walk with her to the roof, where she climbed atop the water tower and beckoned him. She took off her top while he unclasped her bra,” Rothstein reported.

The two engaged in some sexual activity and she allegedly insulted him for not wanting to go near the edge of the water tower. He said she performed a “perfect backward roll off the side of the water tower,” taunted him for being afraid of heights even though he was a Marine, and they continued to flirt and engage in sexually charged activities.

His audio recording of her taped her continuously begging him for sex – a total of 29 admissions. He told her repeatedly he wanted to but thought she was too drunk (he didn’t, but said he used that as a “nuclear option” to get out of the situation). She said she wanted rough sex and allegedly pulled his pants down and tried to “force her mouth on his penis.”

When he’d try to leave, she’d cry. If he declined to have sex with her, she’d say he thought she was “gross.” When he tried to leave again, she wouldn’t let him.

Throughout the tape he declined to have sex with her even though she begged. After he was finally able to leave, she allegedly told her roommate that “Ben tried to have sex with me.” She also told this to her boyfriend who questioned her level of intoxication. The next morning she told Columbia Feibleman sexually assaulted her.

The school refused to ask her questions about his side of the story or even use the evidence he provided.

“At one point, they warned him not to utter a word about a medical report he obtained that addressed her level of capacity based on 700 photographs and the 30-minute recording,” Rothstein reported. “According to his legal complaint, a witness ‘Jane Doe’ called to support her in Columbia’s case against him later called Feibleman and told him that she sometimes mixed pills and alcohol to get over a boyfriend. If he mentioned the report, Columbia authorities said they’d throw him out of the hearing and proceed without him.”

Feibleman is now suing Columbia with the help of attorney Kimberly Lau. Columbia is trying to get Feibleman’s military service records in what Lau says is a fishing expedition, while at the same time refusing to provide Feibleman with relevant documents related to his accusation.

He was found responsible for the sexual activity that occurred before the recording, even though he provided evidence to show Jane wasn’t incapacitated at the time. His case is yet another example of a university doing everything it can to find a male responsible because in today’s #MeToo age, males are expendable while a woman claiming to be a victim must be believed.

Women’s marches precede revolutions…

1. Protests for equal pay- were just before the Nazi’s took over

2) Protests for equal pay – were just before Lenin took over in Soviet Union.

3) Today, we have large Women’s marches for equal pay…. now forecast the future.

Brig, Soren and Reidar-

Remember when we fasted for 24 hours? and how amazing you felt after conquering your hunger?

Listen particularly at 54:25 for one minute, and you will remember that “amazing feeling” that you are stronger than you thought you are!!

I remember the joy and elation you felt that day we fasted. It is an incredible memory I have of our time together. I taught you something amazing- feeling good about yourself.. Love papa.

Ian found out the Mental Health Professionals more often HARM you than they help. They can easily break unstable minds.

Brig, Soren and Reidar- there is a good chance your mother could have been healed in summer of 2017, instead they broke her. Perhaps she truly is a victim, but not in the way she understands.

Ian’s article is here on Quillette:

Donald Trump may be one of the most intensely psychoanalyzed figures in American history, with many critics casually labelling him “narcissistic,” “egomaniacal,” and “sociopathic.” Even if you disagree with these characterizations, it’s difficult to ignore how common they’ve become.

Looking beyond politics, Trump’s legacy may serve to reinforce a specious connection between political preferences and mental health. As I’ve observed firsthand, even before Trump’s rise, some therapists took for granted a link between progressive ideas and good mental health. Trump’s ascendance, along with increasing overall levels of political polarization, and the well-known liberal bias that marks the fields of psychology and mental health, has helped popularize this linkage.

I was raised in a socially conservative family, in which we were taught traditional values, including respect for one’s elders, loyalty to family, and the sanctity of the soul. For the most part, we also learned a creed of self-reliance, and were discouraged from attributing personal failings to societal influences. The idea of mental health wasn’t entirely unknown to us—but it tended to be discussed in a strictly medicalized, psychiatric form. More expansive doctrines touching on family dynamics, “self-care,” and such, on the other hand, were seen as gateways to a nanny-state worldview that we (disparagingly) associated with liberal elites. So when I came of age and sought help from a counselor, I was going against the grain of my own cultural programming.

What I told my first therapist was that I wanted to kill the father in me. It was 2012, and I’d recently graduated from college with a degree in philosophy. I had taken just enough philosophy coursework to begin questioning just about everything I’d been told, but not nearly enough to develop a coherent sense of my own beliefs and a plan for my future. I ended up in a difficult job in the tech field, with no real friends. I felt isolated and angry, in part because I was getting two opposite messages about what was wrong with the world. My conservative father was telling me that the world had gone rotten, while the broader liberal culture I tuned into was telling me that men like him were the real rot. Won over by these new influences, I came to view my dad as a sort of proxy for conservative malignancy, and so arrived at therapy with a desire to exorcise his effects. It was a misguided and simplistic plan—but, unfortunately, the mental-health professionals I met initially encouraged it.

Eventually, after five years in tech, I made a career transition, and became a mental-health professional myself. Some of my new colleagues viewed conservatives as a troubled constituency that should be nominally tolerated, but not actually welcomed. For instance, one manager told me, “Watch what you say politically. You’d be surprised. We actually have conservatives who work here.” I think his intentions were good: He didn’t want me to offend anyone. But I tried to imagine someone saying this about people of color, women, or any other group. I was also concerned for my own professional reputation. I was “passing” for a liberal, apparently. But I worried that my true self might somehow be discovered.

It’s not as if I didn’t have fair warning about the professional culture. When I was applying to counseling and clinical psychology PhD programs, I noticed that the faculty work being conducted commonly featured politicized themes such as oppression, intersectionality, race, gender, and so on. A typical biographical blurb might read something like: “I seek to understand how identity intersections shape the therapeutic relationship and the impact that conversations around culture have on the change clients make in therapy,” or “current research focuses on LGBTQ issues and health and the educational and vocational pursuits of undocumented and legal immigrant students.” There were also plenty of studies with titles such as “The damaging effect of fragile identities: Understanding the role of cultural safe-spaces for people of color in group therapy,” or “Was that racist? Studying the ambiguity of microaggressions and emotional reactions in an experimental study for racial-ethnic minority and white individuals.” (I’m scrambling some of the phraseology—but the actual phrases are all lifted directly from real university faculty pages.)

Of course, there is nothing wrong with people studying these things, nor with the goal of redressing historical wrongs. After all, if the helping professions such as mental health don’t aid those who are oppressed, who will? But in some departments, I noticed, it was hard to find anyone whose work didn’t touch on these themes. Counseling, to me, is about much more than redressing historical wrongs. And it should benefit all of us, not just specific groups. I internalized the message that I was an oppressor, a shameful legacy. And since I didn’t see any other way to fit into the counseling world except to erase that identity, that’s what I tried to do.

Specifically, I spent several years trying to reverse what had been “done to me” by my conservative family. I fell hard into any tract or theory that would help me name and understand the errors of my upbringing. Predictably, this failed to bring me happiness or inner peace: The more I tried to “kill the conservative” in me, the more I perceived my thoughts as problematic. I would berate myself for incorrect ideas and feelings. I wanted to be accepted by liberals, and so sought out their company, even while shunning the conservatives who would accept me for who I am.

If you’re thinking that a lot of what I am describing here is the exact opposite of good therapeutic advice, you’d be right. Yet when my anxieties persisted, my only solution was to “up the dosage.” I got into bitter ideological arguments with conservative co-workers, externalizing my own scathing self-criticism by projecting the fault onto them. Around liberals, I would enthusiastically tear down conservative ideas, hoping to gain praise for doing so. I told one Yale psychologist I worked for that conservatives suffered from “cultural delusions,” and naturally he agreed.

Yet none of this positive feedback could erase the fact that, ultimately, I was a white, Christian, cis-gendered, heterosexual male from a wealthy, conservative family. I wished deeply to be someone else, a longing that my inner woke critic interpreted as just another manifestation of privilege. Since my original sin was lodged ineradicably in my DNA, I was offered no escape. The result was a deep, solipsistic depression.

At the same time, I was trying to manage the same sort of real family and personal issues that many young adults face, and which had originally led me to pursue a range of talk-based therapies over the years. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy had helped me somewhat. I also tried Dialectical Behavioral Therapy; and Exposure Therapy, which at least helped me see that I was hiding from the things I feared. Ultimately, what set me on the right course, though, was a therapist who simply accepted me for who I am.

I wasn’t able to step outside of my intersectional identity, so that’s where she met me. I didn’t feel that I deserved to be heard or seen, and she showed me that I was. I told her I was the oppressor, and she told me I had struggles, just like everyone else. I told her I didn’t deserve any mercy, and she said that I did. In short, she told me everything that now makes sense to me—and, I’m guessing, to you—in the context of becoming a happier person. I was able to feel that I am not the moral sum of my thoughts; that I’m allowed to feel how I feel; and that I’m still a lovable person, even if my beliefs happen to include conservative ideas.

In the process, I’ve found that, notwithstanding the liberal bias I observed in the educational sphere, the antipathy toward conservatives isn’t nearly as pronounced among those mental-health professionals who actually treat clients and help people. I’ve met many therapists who really do care about my emotional world. In fact, I’m discovering that my own hyper-vigilance in regard to liberal ideology led me to overlook opportunities for sharing my thoughts, feelings, and opinions with others.

What I’m describing here is my own personal journey. But the current political climate in my country means that almost everything—even one’s own mental-health challenges—can become an ideological battlefield. And much like conservatives’ exaggerated suspicion of mental-health therapies, progressives’ insistence on typecasting us through intersectional categories can mask, or even exacerbate, the core problems underneath. No matter what a person’s skin color or ideology, encouraging them to feel ashamed about who they are is never conducive to good mental health.

Ian Dempsey is a mental-health professional living in Utah. 

Brett and his wife Heather are brilliant evolutionary scientists.

They were RUINED by the mob at Evergreen College in Washington State. Near our home. They were called RACIST, when they are ANTI-RACIST. This is common a tactic of the mob. The accuse you of exactly what they are doing. (ie, your mother accuses me of child abuse, while she is actively engaged in it… Brig knows all about the ski crampon hoax)

The following video describes how a person who is smart and principled offends weak people (the mob), and the mob often wins. Insanity and violence can be effective in the short term, but ultimately causes destruction of themselves.

part 2 & 3 will pop into youtube.

Let’s see. Another attractive, highly educated mother who kills her children. Brig, Soren and Reidar, my admonishment that you are in danger is true assessment of risk. But your mother and people around you will deny it.

And once again it involves a custody dispute with court. The pattern happens over and over again.

Article here:

A psychologist in Washington state fatally shot her 7-year-old twin daughters in their sleep before turning the gun on herself in a shocking murder-suicide that followed a custody dispute over the girls, according to reports.

Deputies responded to the Sudden Valley home of Michele Boudreau Deegan, 55, at about 1:15 p.m. Saturday after a roommate at the residence reported finding his landlord and her two children dead, according to the Whatcom County Sheriff’s Office.

Investigators determined that the custody dispute was the “primary motive” behind the murder-suicide, which occurred sometime Friday evening.

On her website, Deegan wrote that her “goal is to teach clients new ways of perceiving their problem, healthy coping behaviors for responding to their problem, and healthy attitudes & communication skills for working with their families, partners, or work environment so they can make changes in their own life.”

Under the heading “Life Can Be Better,” she wrote that “there are many great therapists in our community and I am humbled to be able to stand amongst them as a supporter of freedom, hope, healing, acceptance and love.”

On the day of her twins’ death, she shared an article on ScaryMommy.com titled “Narcissistic Parents Are Literally Incapable Of Loving Their Children” on her professional Facebook page.

“Really right now, I’m just in shock, I can’t believe this happened,” a neighbor told local TV station KIRO 7.

Other neighbors told the outlet that the girls had rarely been seen outside their home.

One person who knows the family told KIRO 7 that child welfare authorities had also been alerted at one point.

One of Deegan’s friends reacted to the tragedy on a Facebook post, saying the mother was “mentally ill,” according to the Daily Mail.

“Michelle was a wonderful woman….she HAD TO HAVE BEEN trying (in an absolutely sick, unimaginably twisted way, obviously) to ‘protect’ the girls from a life with their dad without her,” Jen Mindlin wrote.

“She was a kind and warm friend, bright and empathetic, a psychologist with a local practice that helped so many people, including me, and my daughter,” she continued, adding that Deegan was “in a horrific custody battle, with a man she had a domestic violence protection order against.”

She wrote that “every time she believed her divorce was almost final, she would be dragged into a new frivolous and expensive renegotiation, she had been bankrupted by litigation, right or wrong, she worried for her girls with their dad…..(the sad irony is not lost on me)……this was a mental health tragedy, not a terrible person.”

Mindlin added: “Compassion is truly in order here. I loved (and nannied) those girls, and I’m angry too….I just really want everyone to know that Michelle did NOT abuse the girls, she loved them. She was just sick….and scared.”

Whatcom County Sheriff Bill Elfo said: “It’s a real tragic situation that we’re still investigating, trying to get more information on what might have motivated someone to do something this horrific.”

All lawyers agree that Women make FALSE ALLEGATIONS of abuse to win tactically in the courts. Brig, Soren and Reidar… your mother is no different.

The hashtag “#BelieveAllWomen” is Orwewellian double speak. Rather your starting assumption being to “Believe Her”, your starting assumption should be that the mother is lying in court.

More than 80% of mothers lie about abuse to gain advantage and money in family court. By law, the burden of proof is on the accuser to provide evidence, but that is no longer required for a mother. It is a perversion of the justice system.