Author: papa

https://twitter.com/AnimalsWorId/status/1345293417622822912

George Orwell's final warning.

He knew what was coming. pic.twitter.com/6fufwJE4c3

— Sir Truth Seeker 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 🚜🇳🇱🇵🇸 (@Truth_S_eeker) January 18, 2021

Remember the Bat Theory for Covid-19?

It was originally a lie to deflect responsibility. It is still a lie.

Brig, Soren and Reidar- have you ever lied when something bad happened? That is what China did, and they still will not take responsibility.

Taking responsibility is necessary for being trustworthy. We all have flaws, but taking responsibility for your flaws, taking ownership of problems or failure is the hallmark good character. BeBrave. Love Papa.

BBC claims it’s not “in the public interest” to report on fatal false rape accusation case!

BRIG- SOREN – REIDAR

LIARS LIKE YOUR MOTHER ARE PROTECTED BY THE MEDIA. They can destroy lives, kill people and make false allegations of anything. The more outrageous the better for them, then nobody asks for evidence.

I am putting all this information onto an un-erasable archive for you, so you can be informed, and not ensnared in lies and deceit. I have been thwarted at every turn trying to protect from the false allegations by your mother.

When you hear the expression ‘not in public interest’, it is curtain to hide lies, and deny you knowledge that is in your best interest. Love papa.

Earlier this week we reported on the tragic case of Grant Townsend, a young man from Hull who sadly took his own life after being falsely accused of rape. In the article we noted the lack of national media coverage of the case, highlighting in particular the public service obligations of the BBC to report on the case (specifically the local BBC Look North and radio Humberside networks).

We’re pleased to say that our initial report is now somewhat outdated and sections of the media picked up on the story immediately after our article was published. On Wednesday the Daily Mail published an excellent article concerning the case, as did The Sun Newspaper. Notably, these two titles are the best selling newspapers in the country. Thankfully this wasn’t the end of the matter either, with the Daily Mirror catching up with the story on Thursday, and thus bringing it to a more left-leaning audience.

As promised on Tuesday we got in touch with the BBC to ask them to either detail their coverage of the case (assuming we couldn’t find it) or to remedy any failure to report on the case immediately as per their public service broadcasting obligations. We regret to inform readers that the response we received from the BBC was again totally unacceptable and quite frankly a disgrace.

Andrew Robson of the BBC emailed us a response explaining the “context” for the organisation’s decision to hide the story from the airwaves. His statement included the following:

It’s worth noting the BBC takes the reporting of suicides very seriously; we judge the impact of our reporting of each case, and the public interest in doing so. We work in line with guidance produced by The Samaritans and note that suicide should not be seen as a simple cause and effect situation but that often there are multiple, complex factors involved. On this occasion, it was judged that we would not cover this story. 

These three sentences by Robson are so full of falsehoods and raises so many concerns about the BBC and its agenda that quite frankly it’s hard to know where to begin. Firstly, is proves that the failure to cover Townsend’s case wasn’t some mere oversight at the BBC and/or perhaps a failure to spot the story, but a clear and deliberate act and thus the breach of the BBC’s public service broadcast obligations was 100% intentional.

Robson is suggesting that the “impact” of reporting on the reality of fatal false rape accusations to the general public somehow wouldn’t be a good or desirable thing and instead such matters and the victims of such acts should be swept under the carpet as if they never existed. He goes further, noting that they don’t believe it was “in the public interest” to report on Townsend’s case. This simply goes to show just how out of touch the BBC are with the general public, as we mentioned before not only is there the public interest angle of suicide and mental health, there’s also the massively important issue of false rape accusations not to mention the urgent need for anonymity for the accused. If you’re counting, that’s at least four separate public interest angles, some of which are particularly topical right now.

While it’s true that many cases of depression and suicide are unexplained and not linked to life events, this completely omits the experiences of so many who do experience reactive depression due to traumatic life events. For example, fathers groups are constantly dealing with depressed men who experience depression and suicidal thoughts thanks to contact denial and parental alienation. Sadly, too many go beyond mere suicidal thoughts, yet in BBC land somehow we’re supposed to pretend the erasure of fathers from their children’s lives somehow has no impact and certainly never kills anyone.

Contact denial of course isn’t the only form of domeiitc abuse and it’s rather convenient that BBC policy allows the organisation to obsess on the cases of fatal domestic abuse where violence by a partner is the cause of death, yet it ignores any such victims driven to suicide. One has to wonder if this is becasue the number of men killed by domestic abuse would in fact be higher than the number of women killed were we to take into account all the victims drive to suicide?

Robson also stated:

The choice of stories covered by our programmes is the decision of our editorial leaders. Their decisions take into account a number of factors such as what else is happening on any given day, how much time there is in the output, and the available resources.  

Well, we basically pre-empted this paragraph in our previous article, but Robson has more than confirmed everything we claimed. A man driven to suicide by false rape accusation is far, far less important to the BBC than some missing pet dogs, a potential women’s trek to the north pole next year, not to mention a baby being born in a car park. You see, with all those massive and hugely important stories hogging the Look North headlines at the same time as the Grant Townsend case, there just isn’t the “time” or “available resources” to take a 90 second walk across the street from the BBC studios to the Coroner’s office to report on this case.

Considering this scandal more deeply and taking a wider look at the issue, what we have here once again is in fact blatant sex discrimination by the BBC. The overwhelming majority of victims of fatal false rape accusation are men and of course the overwhelming majority of victims of suicide are men, with men much more prone to suicide stemming from reactive depression, a type of suicide which is so often much more straightforward and simple to prevent by simply tackling the root cause of said reactive depression (be it contact denial, domestic violence or false rape accusation etc).

So we have all these issues which overwhelmingly have male victims and male deaths, yet the wisdom of the BBC is that it’s simply not in the “public interest” to report on such cases. This is of course blatant sex discrimination – BBC policy allows and in fact emphasises reporting on women who die tragically, yet with men, the “impact” of the reports is inappropriate and so men’s death (and their lives too) and simply erased from broadcasts. Looking at the issue further, male suicide disproportionally impacts groups such as the working class, so not only do we have sex discrimination but once again the BBC prioritising their beloved middle class.

The real icing on the cake here isn’t so much the actual content contained within Robson’s email, but perhaps more telling is what is absent. At no single point anywhere in his statement does Robson even hint at, let alone even acknowledge the false allegations that caused Townsend’s death. Every newspaper headline notes these, his friends note them as the root cause of his depression and decline, and they are absolutely key to the story. So, not only can the BBC not bare to mention such topics in their news articles, or TV and radio broadcasts, they can’t even bring themselves to mention them to you or I via an email. Even acknowledging the issue is simply off limits, almost as if it’s somehow illegal or damaging to their social credit score.

And if anyone from the BBC (or from anywhere) still isn’t convinced by any of the above then there’s one way to prove the points beyond any doubt. Merely compare and contrast all the above with the BBC’s reporting of the Eleanor De Freitas case and it’s clear this has little or nothing to do with BBC guidelines, or public interest. I would previously have said that the main BBC guideline is that men are second class citizens, but it looks like they’re now third class, below dogs.

Below is our much deserved response to Mr Robson at the radfem BBC, enjoy:

Dear Mr Robson,

Many thanks for your reply and providing the much needed “context” for your decision.

On reflection it was of course very silly of us to think the the issues of false rape accusations, the urgent need for anonymity for the accused, suicide, reactive depression and mental health were remotely in the “public interest”, and clearly the “impact” of even acknowledging fatal false rape accusations is so horrific that you couldn’t even bring yourself to do it in your email, let alone on the airwaves or on a BBC website.

You’re clearly all doing a great job at the BBC ensuring all “available resources” are ploughed into finding missing dogs and giving in-depth reports on random women running around with tyres tied to them. Clearly with these two massive stories going on at the same time, not to mention some baby being born in some car park, it would have been absolutely impossible for your staff to walk the 200 meters from the BBC studios to the Coroner’s office down the street to report on this case, nor would there have been enough time in your crowded output either. The licence fee is clearly great value and this surely proves it beyond any doubt and any allegations that your organisation is out of touch with the general public is clearly 100% false.

In all seriousness, I was going to inform our readers that the main BBC policy was in fact that men are second class citizens. You have of course proved me completely wrong, and clearly men and now in fact third class citizens behind dogs.

Update, we asked Erin Pizzey, founder of the world’s first fddomestic violence hsleters to comment on this matter and add her expertise to the discussion. She stated:

The hysterical BBC response to the suicide of Caroline Flack resulted in complaints from the public which only confirms what I have always believed that the BBC are institutionally guilty of discriminating against men. I also believe that Parental Alienation and false allegations against men are the leading cause of male suicide.

Brig, Soren and Reidar-

You have all the talents of Zev. He is 15 years old. Please watch and see how great you can be. Intelligent, high-moral character and aware of current events. You have everything he does.

All it takes is courage to get out of your current stifling environment. #BeBrave love papa.

Boys are Disposable

Society treats you as disposable. Don’t let it happen. You are a sovereign individual with dignity. Brig, Soren and Reidar, do not let them take away your dignity.

The courts, the psychologists, the Monkhouses and many others have treated you as disposable. No dignity.

You are NOT disposable, and I am fighting for your rights everyday. love papa.

Warren Farrell has been described as the intellectual father of the men’s rights movement. He’s the author of best-selling books on the subject, including his latest, The Boy Crisis. But he didn’t actually begin his career studying the issues facing men and boys in America and throughout the Western world.

Warren Farrell’s career began working in the women’s liberation movement, and not just as a bystander. “When the women’s movement surfaced in the late ’60s, I felt it was so important that I changed my Ph.D. dissertation to focus on it; formed some 300 men’s and women’s ‘consciousness-raising’ groups (one of which was joined by John Lennon); and was elected three times to the board of NOW [National Organization for Women] in NYC,” he told the Institute for Family Studies.

“But as divorces became common in the 1970s, and I saw families suffering from fatherlessness, I beseeched NOW to support the equal involvement of dads after divorce,” Farrell said. “But NOW feared losing the support of women who wanted the option of having primary custody.”

That began Farrell’s shift in focus. “As the women’s movement went mainstream, I loved the options for women it created, but also felt there was a demonizing of men, an undervaluing of the family, and a blindness to how boys and men were being harmed that would have profound effects on families, boys, addiction, careers, male unemployment, the global economy and so on,” he explained. “When I uncovered reasons that were not part of the public consciousness, I felt I had something to contribute.”NEWSWEEK SUBSCRIPTION OFFERS >

Farrell soon discovered that there was little serious attention being paid to the space of boy’s development, either in academia or anywhere else. The subject was, in Farrell’s words, “a national afterthought.”

What was not an afterthought to Farrell were the big disparities in outcomes of every kind between boys and girls in America. Disparities that crossed ethnic, racial and geographic boundaries.

Take education. “Worldwide, boys are 50 percent less likely than girls to meet basic proficiency in reading, math and science,” Farrell notes on his website. And though girls have made historic strides on the college graduation front, boys have seen radical declines. Women make up nearly 60 percent of the total college graduates in the United States, which is great news for girls. But bad news for boys, whose numbers continue to decline.

Take mental health. The ADHD diagnosis rate is on the rise, as are the rates of other mental health indicators like depression and drug abuse. And then there’s the mental health indicator that’s most disturbing of all: suicide.NEWSWEEK SUBSCRIPTION OFFERS >

“Before age 9, boys and girls commit suicide equally,” Farrell told a Tedx audience. “By age 10 to 14, it is twice the amount for boys. Between 15 and 19, it is four times the amount, and by ages 18 to 24, it is six times the amount. That’s staggering.” Often, these tragedies seem to share one circumstance: the lack of a father in the home.

And nowhere is the data more tragic than our prison system. Ninety-three percent of our prison population is male. And that disparity can’t be explained by police discrimination. Or systemic bias against boys.

Facts, Farrell discovered, are stubborn things, even if they make some people uncomfortable. Boys are the ones committing the vast majority of violent crime, not girls. And when it comes to murder, it is young men doing the killing, mostly. Young men—Black, white and Hispanic. And the vast majority of the victims are young men too.

How did we get here? “It starts with how we’ve used our sons historically,” Farrell explained. “Every society that has survived has done so by training its boys to be disposable—disposable in war, in work (coal mines, oil rigs, firefighting). This means the survival of our son’s conflicts with our survival. And it’s hard to become psychologically attached to someone we might lose. And to train our sons to forfeit their lives in war and hazardous jobs (92 percent of workplace deaths are male), we had to train them to act tough and not express feelings.”

There was a price to be paid for this. “We don’t pay attention to the wheel that doesn’t squeak,” Farrell said. “And women can’t hear what men don’t say. Which is also why boys and men’s weakness is their façade of strength.”

Farrell wasn’t finished, shifting things to the subject of male power and privilege. “We’ve assumed males had the power and made the rules, so if they had a problem, they could just change the rules,” Farrell explained. “The Boy Crisis explains a different type of powerlessness boys and men often experience. For example, a boy’s dream to be an actor, writer or mountain climber often becomes, if he has children, a reality of selling product X that he doesn’t believe in—or, in brief, feeling obligated to earn money his family spends while he dies sooner. We’ve cast men’s higher pay as privilege and power, as opposed to understanding that the road to high pay is a toll road. When we discount a gender’s contribution—as we used to when women said ‘I’m just a housewife’—it’s easier to make them an afterthought. All of this contributes to our caring less about boys, and the closer they get to becoming men, the less we care.”

Farrell argues that the biggest contributor to our nation’s boy crisis—and to growing gaps in everything from income inequality to incarceration rates—is what he calls “dad deprivation.” According to the U.S. Census Bureau, about one in four children in America lives without a father in the home.

“These boys don’t benefit from overnights, hang-out time, and the many hours it takes for boys to bond with their dads, and trust that their feelings won’t be dismissed,” Farrell explained. Dads use that time to play with their sons, teaching them how to channel their masculine energy in productive ways. Boundary enforcement plays a big part in that interaction.

“Boys with minimal or no father involvement more frequently suffer from an addiction to immediate gratification,” Farrell noted. “For example, with minimal or no father involvement, there is a much greater likelihood of video game addiction, more ADHD, worse grades in every subject, less empathy, less assertiveness (but more aggression), fewer social skills, more alienation and loneliness, more obesity, rudderlessness, anger, drugs, drinking, delinquency, disobedience, depression and suicide.”

And that dad deprivation is not limited to the home. “Boys go from dad deprivation in the home to a male teacher deprivation in the school,” Farrell explained in his Tedx talk. “We now know that boys do better with male teachers on average.” In 2017-18, women earned almost 80 percent of all U.S. master’s degrees in education, something Farrell calls the “feminization of education.”

It is thus no surprise to Farrell that boys are responsible for so much of the nation’s violence. “Boys who hurt, hurt us,” Farrell tells anyone who will listen. “School shootings, which are both homicides and either direct or de facto suicides, are just one example of dad-deprived boys both being hurt and hurting us—in essence, blaming their schools for not being adequate substitute dads.”

Boys with dad-deprivation often experience a volcano of festering anger. “Anger is vulnerability’s mask,” Farrell explained, “and with boys’ much greater tendency to act out, the boys who hurt will be the ones most likely to hurt.” All of which, added together, leads boys to feel utterly without purpose. And thus, without hope.

Does Farrell see any hope or change on the horizon? “The solution involves recognizing the crucial role a father’s love plays in the development of boys. And the need to begin to redefine what it means to be a man in the 21st century,” he said.

“Just as we have recognized for many decades now that women’s biology is not their destiny, that they can work outside the home, and serve in the military, and do all the other things once seen as primarily or strictly male, so too must we recognize that men’s biology does not absolutely require putting themselves in harm’s way.”

It may seem obvious to those who study the subject, but if Farrell is right about one thing, it is this: to fix many of our social ills, we must start addressing the boy crisis in America.

Lee Habeeb is vice president of content for Salem Radio Network and host of Our American Stories. He lives in Oxford, Mississippi, with his wife, Valerie, and his daughter, Reagan.

Detroit man freed from life sentence after investigation shows trial was unfair

Brig, Soren and Reidar- this is one of thousands of examples of innocent people in prison. There was never any evidence, and even when people fought for his freedom, they denied the embarrassing reality that there was no evidence. This happens over and over again.

---

MIRIAM MARINI | DETROIT FREE PRESS

After serving 16 years behind bars, Kenneth Nixon walked out of prison as a free man and was reunited with his family after felony murder charges were dismissed Thursday by a Wayne County Circuit Court judge.

Nixon was granted relief by Judge Bruce Morrow after an investigation found that he failed to receive a fair trial. He was immediately released from Michigan Reformatory in Ionia.

Nixon, 34, was sentenced to two life terms in connection to a Detroit house bombing that killed a 10-year-old boy and an infant in 2005. He was 18 at the time. Nixon and his girlfriend were arrested and charged with murder, arson, and four counts of attempted murder; she was acquitted by a jury.

A dog trained to detect accelerants indicated he smelled one on the second floor of the house that was firebombed.  DETROIT FREE PRESS FILE

The key witness in Nixon’s trial was the 13-year-old brother of the children who were killed in the home. He pinned Nixon to the scene of the crime on the 19420 block of Charleston. During the trial, prosecutors’ suspicions were raised against the 13-year-old witness, as his testimonies were inconsistent.

The only other person to testify was a jail informant who, in exchange for sentencing leniency in another case, told investigators that Nixon admitted to the house bombing. In a later interview, the informant said that despite telling police that he had no prior information about the case before Nixon’s admission, he had seen televised news coverage of the fire.

The case was reviewed by the prosecutor’s office’s Conviction Integrity Unit, which collaborated with the Cooley Law Innocence Project and found that Nixon did not receive a fair trial. Nixon maintained his innocence throughout.

WMU-Cooley Innocence Project Staff Attorney David Williams (left) with Kenneth Nixon during a media briefing. Nixon was released after being wrongfully convicted of murder, attempted … Show more   PROVIDED BY THE WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY COOLEY LAW SCHOOL INNOCENCE PROJECT

More: Internal memos, prosecution cast doubt on Kenneth Nixon’s life sentence

“The issues and findings of the (conviction integrity unit) have convinced me that Mr. Nixon did not receive a fair trial,” Wayne County Prosecutor Kym Worthy said in a statement.

Further muddying the prosecutor’s case was that three witnesses interviewed by the Medill Justice Project said they saw Nixon the night of the fire and he could not have committed the crime. Nixon’s girlfriend was with him that entire night but could not testify in his trial as a codefendant.

The star witness, the 13-year-old boy, gave authorities widely divergent accounts of the events of the night, including where he was in the house and whether he actually saw Nixon throw a Molotov cocktail into the house. 

Brandon Vaughn, then 13, gave conflicting accounts of what he saw the night of the fire. In his first interview with an arson investigator shortly … Show more   DETROIT FREE PRESS FILE

More: Metro Detroit cop charged with running criminal enterprise, embezzlement

“The 13-year-old witness was the victim of a devastating arson fire that killed his infant sister and his young brother in their home,” Worthy said. “The statements and testimony by this key witness were inconsistent to support what is basically the sole identification of Mr. Nixon.”

At trial, prosecutors cited the gasoline on Nixon’s clothes as evidence of his guilt. But Nixon, a tow-truck driver, said he often had gasoline on his clothes, and a witness corroborates his account that he fixed a car with a fuel leak either the day of or the day before the fire, according to a report for the Free Press by the Medill Justice Project.

“A vital part of the justice system is ensuring that convictions rest on sound evidence and investigative practices,” said David Williams, an attorney with the Cooley Law Innocence Project, in a statement.

Through tears, the victims’ mother, Naomi Vaughn, urged for a retrial during the hearing for Nixon’s release Thursday, citing conversations with friends pinning Nixon to the scene and her son’s credibility.

“Where’s the justice for me and my children? It’s like a slap in the face all over again,” Vaughn said. “This is so unfair to me, it’s like basically my kids meant nothing. My kids just died for no reason.”

However, Morrow said that part of achieving justice while navigating a system ingrained with biases is ensuring the accused is given the right to present evidence. Much of the evidence found by the county prosecutor’s Conviction Integrity Unit, which was established in 2018, was discovered after the trial.

“There’s nothing that can be done to bring those sweet children back,” Morrow said. “But complicating it by furthering injustice is not the way to deal with it.

“Justice for Mr. Nixon has finally been achieved.”

Contact Miriam Marini: [email protected]

The Murder of John Mast

Parental Alienation Kills People

John Mast was brutally murdered on 5-Feb-2021, when ostensibly meeting his ex-wife to pick up his kids. His ex-wife did not send the kids however, … instead she sent her father with a gun.

The newspaper articles simply report it as a domestic murder, and refuse to even mention the mother’s name or show her picture. The newpapers and internet articles show the slain father (John), and a mug shot of the alleged assailant – the mother’s radicalized father. But they refuse to disclose who the Mother is, her name and her photo.

Why is Mother’s name and photo omitted? Remember she is the one court ordered to deliver the children, and she is the individual that arranged the meeting… yet her name and photo is missing in the media reports? Why is she protected?

John had finally won a 3 year long legal battle to regain shared custody of their children. His first court ordered visitation was scheduled for Feb 5, 2020, and he was murdered exactly at the time and location his ex-wife arranged for the handoff of the children. But John never got to see the kids- instead he was greeted with 9mm bullets. The murder was in broad daylight, and captured on video camera.

This article is an investigative report to expose the actual predator. Her name is Rebecca Brashear-Mast, and she is the Mother.

Remember what Hermione Granger says about Voldemort in Harry Potter:

“fear of a name increases fear of a thing itself.”

And we as a society are afraid to talk publicly about Parental Alienation and the cruel weaponization of children in the Family Court. Parental Alienation is deadly, just like Voldemort.

Start by saying: PARENTAL ALIENATION

Parental Alienation is when a predator parent prevents the other parent from seeing the children. The children are taken by the predator parent as hostages, and used for ransom payments or blackmail. The simplest way to hold a child hostage is to go the police and make a false allegation of violence or sexual assault against the spouse. Done. The children are immediately removed (or alienated) from the parent, who is considered guilty until there is a court hearing, generally months later. In John’s case it was a full 12 months.

Justice delayed, is Justice denied.

The magnitude of the Parental Alienation can be minor at first, but the false allegations of violence or abuse rarely disappear, even when they are proven to be outright fabrications and lies. In fact, the common pattern in the family court is that when an allegation by a predator parent is proven to be FALSE, the predator parent actually doubles down and increases the falsehoods in the next court round with even more outrageous lies. So the false allegations escalate, step-by-step, until the Parental Alienation becomes severe.

Such is exactly the case with Ms. Rebecca Brashear-Mast. Rebecca’s first lie was a going to Police, and filing formal charges of domestic violence against John. Today we know the reason why she filed the false charges: jealousy. Rebecca claimed that John was “unfaithful” with another woman and that was the subject of a heated dinner conversation at the Basil Restaurant, 17-Oct-2017. John’s claims of innocence that he was not “sexually unfaithful” to Rebecca did not matter to her distress. For Rebecca, John was guilty of “emotional infidelity” and she felt so emotionally hurt that she jerked her arm, and disabled her shoulder. This “self-injury” was falsely reported to Police as a crime of domestic violence…Rebecca seeked and was granted a restraining order against John immediately, preventing him from seeing his children. Finally 12 months later! , when the court reviewed the video evidence from the restaurant (the restaurant stonewalled releasing the tape) it was obvious that Rebecca lied and made up the false allegations of domestic abuse as a revengeful action. Rebecca did not face any punishment for making false allegations to the police, and no penalty for Rebecca that she refused John seeing his own children. Incredible.

That is how Parental Alienation begins… a first lie to the police.

But 12 months of passing did not heal Rebecca’s vengeance, and rather than feeling contrition for her original lies about John, Rebecca now felt further humiliation by her domestic abuse allegations being exposed as fraudulent. She was publicly exposed as a bitter and revengeful wife. Rebecca was also found guilty of violating federal law by taking the children out of state- 800 miles away from John. But no matter, the court provided mercy for her first lies.

But Rebecca learned an important lesson in court, a lesson she would employ over and over again. Her lesson:

There is no penalty when a mother lies in court.

Rebecca immediately doubled-down on her lies and accused John of rape – notably when they were still married. Therefore John was removed from children (again) and presumed guilty for months awaiting a court hearing. John was cleared of all rape charges, but now had been removed from his children’s lives for almost 2 years!

The second lie leads to third lie, which lead to a fourth lie…

Once John was cleared of the rape charges, Rebecca doubled-down again and claimed that John sexually sodomized both his son (homosexual incest) and sexually assaulted his daughter. These are third and fourth lies by Rebecca.

Rebecca had learned her lesson well, lies work. She also learned that even outlandish claims, totally outrageous claims, did not garner much pushback from friends or therapists. Rather she learned that the more outrageous the claim (e.g. homosexual incest), the stronger her friends and therapists supported her lies. They even defended her lies!

Pesky things like facts and evidence did not matter. All that mattered was the emotional support of her mother (Robin Brashear- a mental health professional no less), and her father Robert Brashear who has now confessed to the murder of John. Rebecca also enlisted a series of child therapists who never spoke with John, but just naively believed Rebecca’s outrageous allegations. Naïve people are allies for liars, and Rebecca collected a whole entourage when you read through the court depositions.

But courts are designed to look at facts, not emotions, and Rebecca’s lies had escalated to absurdity … such that they didn’t pass the smell test. There was a multi-day Family Court hearing in May 2020. Many of the facts were revealed in those days in May 2020, but the Judge’s decision was delayed again, kicking-the-can down the road. Kevin Mackey, a lawyer practicing for 20 years in divorces, say he has never seen a decision delayed so many months. The court was covering its eyes, and delaying its responsibility, and hoping the embarrassing lies of Rebecca would some how go away. Kicking-the-can-down-the-road.

Justice delayed is Justice denied. John had been alienated from his children for multiple years now.

Finally in December 2020, the Judge, Mr. Josh Rustad declared that John was cleared of all sexual assault charges and that Rebecca was ordered to share custody of the children with John. John was ecstatic with the news: it wasn’t truly justice- it was ‘Disneyland Dad” visitation rights- but at least he could see his kids again. The Judge mentioned numerous times the lack of credibility in Rebecca’s statements, but decided not to censure her. While John’s defense team had argued that the children were not safe with such a delusional mother- a serial liar, the Judge denied this request, and ordered only visitation rights for John. Rebecca was declared the primary custodian of the children. Finally on February 5th, 2021, a day of infamy, a handoff of the children was scheduled as the first visitation for John to see the children, Ashira and Zayne.

Rebecca’s 4th lying gig was up. What could she falsely accuse him of next?

The ultimate and final form of Parental Alienation is murder… Rebecca knew how she could alienate the children from their father – forever.

Rebecca decided not to send the kids to the agreed hand-over meeting with John on 5-February-2021, she ambushed him instead.

Shall we meet our Predator Parent?

You can see her full Instagram profile here @rebeccamast912 . She is following dozens of Yoga Gurus, wellness experts, crystals, militant vegans, sexy men and women.

It is clear from the 200+ people she follows on Instagram that she is high in vanity, fashion, crystals and self-help messages. Not a single one of her wellness gurus tells her to speak the truth, work hard, and take responsibility. Instead they admonish her to wear sunglasses, listen to crystals and take vanity-selfies. Follow your feelings, and ignore the reality of your accomplishments.

What becomes obvious from reading her Facebook and Instagram accounts is that she not only lies to her husband and the children, but that she lies to herself about herself. She is fully delusional which is the standard DSM-5 diagnosis for Parental Alienation. It might be only a sad story of mental health, but unfortunately her lies metastasize into murderous death and imprisonment. These delusional lies could have been stopped. The first lie was forgiven, the second lie, the third lie, the fourth… it ends in murder.

John’s legal defense team repeatedly argued to have a psychological assessment performed on Rebecca. Her previous false allegations under oath, suicide attempt and revengeful behavior provided ample evidence of mental instability. Yet the Court ruled that administering a psychological evaluation of Rebecca would be too stressful for her. Rebecca constantly plays the character of a victim. The court ruled that Rebecca should be shielded from such an intrusive psychological examination. In hindsight, this is certainly a blood-stained error.

I think any lay person reading through Rebecca’s social media profile would have sufficient evidence to declare her mental fitness questionable- even without a professional assessment.

John is Squeaky Clean

While Rebecca was considered too fragile by the court to be subjected to a psychological evaluation, John was required to perform dozens of psychological tests. He was always having to prove a negative. He was “presumed guilty” before the court hearings, and had “prove his innocence” in court. Which he did, with flying colors.

The escalating pattern of false allegations is always present in Parental Alienation cases. The Family Court provides a legal forum for people to lie and make false allegations. A False Allegation is simply a lie “under oath”.

Counterintuitively – the more innocent the accused person, the more outrageous the claims of the crime. This pattern happens over and over again.

A robust legal defense of an innocent and squeaky clean person can actually backfire, and get him or herself into far deeper trouble. An accuser can ensnare a flawed person by ‘exaggerating or bending” the truth a bit. But if the accuser wants to ensnare a virtuous, squeaky clean person,… they have to escalate the allegations dramatically. Rebecca took her false allegations to the moon, accusing John with “homosexual incest of a minor”.

John’s psychological tests [Abeltest] showed him in the lowest 6% for sexual deviancy. John was not a normal guy. Actually John was an extraordinary guy. John was way above normal as a father, and that is why Rebecca had to inflate her lies so much.

The outcome of a violent murder was predictable in this case. John’s murder is not a bewildering random act of violence, or an unlucky coincidence. John was murdered BECAUSE he was innocent and an extraordinary father. None of the crazy violence allegations by Rebecca could stick to John’s character. The allegations were a decoy, to avoid scrutiny of the actual violent person in this case, REBECCA. Ultimately Rebecca had to go outside the law to achieve her ultimate goal- total alienation.

If John was guilty of something, even something minor, then Rebecca would have made an “exaggerated” allegation of that real event. The canary-in-the-coal-mine to this murder is the escalating pattern of lies with Rebecca. Follow the timeline of increasing lies, and it will lead you to a murder. When Rebecca’s lies became outrageously, ridiculously false – in fact– her lies were delusional to anyone with a bit of common sense, then bloodshed became inevitable.

When the court finally cleared John of all ridiculous sexual abuse charges, then murder became a physical way for Rebecca to Alienate and remove John from the children- FOREVER.

You cannot have Parental Alienation without Lies. And the greater the falsehoods, the more severe the alienation. False Allegations = equals = Parental Alienation. Many Family Courts are not aware of this simple relationship between lies and parental alienation. Small lies lead to unhealthy and dysfunctional relationships, and big lies will lead to murder or suicide, always.

Perhaps you are doubtful that lies can kill people… Dear Reader, let’s do a thought experiment together.

Ask yourself how would you react if you are innocent and your spouse accuses you of the following:

“violent homosexual assault and incest” ?

And in this experiment you not allowed to laugh the accusation away. The police are at your door with handcuffs. What would you do? Have a heart attack? Mount a vigorous defense? Sob, panic?.. pray to God?

Mounting a vigorous defense, and declaring innocence brings the real risk that your delusional spouse will have you snuffed out (John’s Fate) … and the only alternative is to face your children, and disqualify yourself as a human being (dishonor). Many people will falsely confess to a crime after intimidating interrogation. Walk in John’s shoes just for a moment…what would you do?

Would you fight for your innocence? submit to every possible humiliating test, sexual deviancy and polygraph? Spend every penny you have in your bank account? Boldly face friends and neighbors who hold you in “suspicion”?

That was the exact question facing John Mast for the past 3 years. He paid for his innocence with his life.

Now do you understand that lies can kill? ! A false allegation of sexual assault can actually be worse than a real sexual assault. False allegations of child abuse and rape kill people.

Lies Destroy Lives- Literally

• John would still be alive if these false allegations had not been made by Rebecca.
• John would still be alive if the court had censured Rebecca as a serial liar and held her accountable for her initial false allegations.
• John would still be alive if the court had granted the request for a psychological evaluation of Rebecca.
• John would still be alive if Rebecca had not radicalized her father, mother and therapists with her belief that she was a victim.
• John would still be alive if Rebecca’s friends had simply asked her to verify her outrageous claims, rather than *believing* her.

Rebecca has conspired to assassinate her husband and now placed her father in prison for the rest of his life. Why are we as a society unable to call evil by its name?

Join me in exposing evil.

Say her name! Rebecca Brashear-Mast. Say it out loud!

Read John last words, just before he was killed. He was so happy to see his children.

Rebecca Facebook profile is designed as a virtue-signaling shield- a shield to protect her fraudulent narrative from being exposed. She is a wolf in sheep’s clothing. She is a predator, not a victim.

It is my speculation that Rebecca did not sit down with her father, James Brashear and beg him or bribe him to assassinate John. I do not consider Rebecca a mafia-type calculating killer. Instead, I think that Rebecca radicalized her father – probably emotionally hijacking him with graphic and explicit details of sexual abuse by John. Rebecca is a well-oil machine of fantastic and outlandish lies. When you read James Brashear’s court affidavit about John, it is clear that he was a ticking-time-bomb of hatred against John. He said under oath, that John was guilty of heinous sexual crimes, irrespective of any evidence. He cultishly *believed* Rebecca’s lies without verifying anything.

James Brashear is not an evil human being, he was naïve to the predator in his daughter. I think that James Brashear is just as much a victim of Rebecca’s lies, as is John Mast. Tragedy all around, and the source of evil [Rebecca] is clear.

Mr. Dean Tong, who provided Expert testimony to the court in this case, has over 35 years experience confronting false allegations and has written multiple books on the subject. Mr. Tong testified to the court that “in his professional experience of representing over 1000 legal cases, he has never seen a more severe case of parental alienation than Rebeca Brashear-Mast”. Make no mistake, the court had the necessary information to make a proper decision about Rebecca’s delusional disorder. The court failed, tragically. In fact the court quotes Mr. Tong’s testimony as “Mr. Tony”, spelling his name wrong and and failed to comprehend the depth of Rebecca’s mental fragility. The court made a deadly mistake, not for a lack of information, or expertise or uncertainty. It failed because of a lack of courage. It was too cowardly to call evil by its name. Hermione Granger was correct.

Say her name, Rebecca Brashear-Mast. Stand up to evil. Be courageous.

“VictimHood Status” is a Shield for Lying

The lies that Rebecca told the court, police and child protective services were massive frauds, but likely redacted versions of what she told her children, parents, therapists and friends. A few naïve people believe the whole enchilada, but the vast majority were regular people unwilling to challenge her lies, and ask for verification. They are afraid of the backlash. They preferred to pity her “victimhood”, rather than understanding they were looking directly into the eyes of a child abuser.

There never was any sexual abuse. Not before, not during, not ever. Dean Tong describes the SAID syndrome in his books, [Sexual Abuse in Divorce] . It is the “ultimate weapon” or the “atomic bomb” of divorce. It is well known by lawyers and family court judges that false sexual abuse allegations are used as a tactical weapon in divorce court. But even in that knowledge, the courts are too cowardly to call out Parental Alienation, or SAID by its name. The court is simply too afraid to pierce the shield of victimology, and declare a mother a liar. Dean Tong was not afraid to call Rebecca , “a dangerous liar”, and John’s legal team requested that the children be removed immediately from Rebecca’s custody- for their safety. In hindsight, they were clearly prescient. However the court, refused advice this expert advice on Parental Alienation, and gave primary, but shared, custody to Rebecca.

Would you be naïve to her message below? Would you pity Rebecca’s victim status? The victim shield is obvious, but it takes courage to challenge the false narrative, and recognize there is a wolf in that sheep’s costume.

This victimhood status sells to friends, even to courts and lawyers and psychiatrists and therapists. The court agreed that Rebecca was delusional and a serial liar and a risk to the children. Almost everyone, including the judge understood that Rebecca was using the false sexual allegations as a tactical advantage in a divorce. But the judge wanted to *believe* that she is not really a child abuser in spite of overwhelming academic knowledge, expert witness testimony, and specific evidence in her case. The judge was afraid to look the predator [Rebecca] in the eyes.

It is very a unsettling thought to believe that a mother could be a predator. So most people deny the evidence, and suffer cognitive dissonance.

That is why the newspapers will not mention the mothers name, or show photographs. It causes cognitive dissonance in their readers. But you Dr. Reader, can see the evil.

Say her name! Rebecca Brashear-Mast. Say it out-loud.

So, what comes next for the children Zayne and Ashira? What do you think Rebecca has planned for them when they challenge her vile narrative about their father. Will she be gentle to John’s memory? or still call him a rapist and pedophile?

Most likely she will fake tears for John at his funeral this week. Another lie. She cannot stop herself. She must be stopped.

It is fairly obvious what will happen to Zayne and Ashira when they learn the truth about their father; that John was a devoted father and never abused them. Imagine what Rebecca will do when Zayne or Ashira says something like,

“…but mummy, I don’t remember Daddy hurting me…”.

YES – you know what will happen. But you are too afraid to say it.

Postpone Justice for John… act swiftly for the safety of the children

It is obvious now… John Mast was denied justice. The courts failed to protect him and his children from a predator.

But, the Police and Court system can act immediately to protect Ashira and Zayne from Rebecca. Robert Brashear is in jail, John is dead, and Rebecca as a violent predator, seemingly roams free…

Act NOW… Lies destroy lives.

Imagine the TERROR Rebecca will feel when her children learned what a fraud and murderer their mother is? It will just destroy Rebecca’s mental balance. You can even feel the shiver yourself. Rebecca understood that the children would learn the truth ( her lies and deceit) when visiting John. What mother wouldn’t die of shame if her children learned that the whole sexual abuse charges were a HOAX : THAT IS WHY SHE HAD TO HAVE JOHN MURDERED.

Rebecca had already attempted suicide once, and had to receive medical attention. She has proven that she is willing to kill herself and her husband, so it is a rather modest speculation to suggest that Rebecca is more than capable of killing her own children.

Here is the crux of the whole situation:

Rebecca will kill to keep her lies from being exposed. She will kill more people, or herself, or the children to keep her secrets hidden. This is a so obvious.

There is no way to keep the lies and falsehoods from the children forever. Truth emerges. When the children become adults they will learn the truth about their mother. It is inevitable.

The children must be removed from Rebecca, and Rebecca must face some reckoning with reality. She needs “reality rehab”, and god-willing hopefully she can repent and return to being a caring mother someday.

Be Brave and join the campaign to expose Rebecca.

John, you cannot rest in peace until your name has been cleared and your children are safe. I will marshal every resource I have to make this happen. Then maybe you, and your children can rest in peace. Your fight for the safety of you children is not over.

Join in, and #beBrave like Harry Potter. Face evil directly. John faced the evil in Rebecca with extraordinary bravery. Let’s honor his legacy, and not kneel to the mob of public silence about parental alienation.

Say her Name! Share her photo! Share this report! John deserves Justice.

John’s Obituary here:

Please reach out to me if you have first-hand information, or evidence. I will update this investigative report as more evidence pours in. Please see notes below about how to comment.

Parental Alienation kills people. Parental Alienation is always caused by false and delusional allegations. Stop the lies, and you stop Parental Alienation.

#Istandwithjohn is hashtag started by Eric Carroll at Dad Talk Today, and he is crowdfunding a documentary.

Dean Tong and others are donating their professional resources Pro Bono to save Zayne and Ashira. Please join in, share and donate. Thank you.

Footnotes and Resources:

Court Docket:

https://publicsearch.ndcourts.gov/default.aspx, then click Williams County and enter name “John Mast”

Overview Interview with expert on Parental Alienation – Dean Tong

Abuse-Excuse.com (Dean Tong)

Psychological screening tests https://abelscreening.com/

Newspaper article detailing murder scene

Ms. Jennifer Gooss, Attorney for Rebecca Brashear-Mast

Mr. Kevin Hickey, Attorney for John Mast

Rebecca as Domestic Abuse Victim on Facebook

Rebecca on Instagram, https://www.instagram.com/rebeccamast912/

Rebecca on Facebook, https://www.facebook.com/becky.brashearmast/

James Brashear was a known ticking time bomb, X-Zone Radio Show

If you declare a woman, Voldemort, it can get you doxxed by the NY Times. They are seriously afraid to call evil by its name.

Notes on Comments, Reporting, Blocking etc.

Revealing truths triggers many emotional people, and this post will undoubtedly generate raging emotions in fragile people.

Typically their first reaction is enter into name-calling:

• misogynist
• white supremacist, racist
• alt-right, MRA, nazi… whatever is the latest flavor of the month.

While none of these “name-callings” have any bearing in reality, it does not matter to them. They are venting their emotions like a child might on a schoolyard playground. I will ignore your name-calling.

It is my first amendment right to speak. Legally you cannot cancel or block me, even if you wish too.

“Canceling me” or “Reporting me to authorities” is your next response if I refuse to engage in your name-calling. I get it…, you see… it is the same escalating warfare that alienating parents engage in. They keep escalating the battle to suppress real information from being revealed.

“Reality is the actual enemy”, and I am simply the messenger.

Rebecca Brashear-Mast continues to have every opportunity to reveal any ACTUAL ABUSE by John. Please encourage her to reveal information, rather than attacking me as the messenger. She can tell her own story on substack, or anywhere else.

You may want to *believe* than Rebecca is not guilty of outrageous lies and conspiracy to murder. Fine- live in your world devoid of facts- only emotions, and I will leave you alone. You do not have to challenge my facts on the ground and in the court documents. Just leave me alone.

What you are NOT ALLOWED to do is eviscerate me because I provided evidence that your fragile emotional state cannot handle. That is your emotional problem. Deal with your fragile emotional state yourself.

Legal disclaimer,

I am legally allowed to post the name and photos of Rebecca Brashear-Mast. Each photo and description has been posted publicly and voluntarily by her. Rebecca’s posts are set for PUBLIC consumption, not to private group of friends or supporters. She gleefully posted her Facebook and Instagram photos to the world, including those of the children.

Generally when children have been abducted or abused, their pictures are plastered all over milk cartons and Amber Alert messages are sent out with photos. The child’s picture is revealed as a victim (do you know this person?) , and the perpetrators mug shot is exposed (do you know this person?). It is effectively a tip line to stop abuse or terror.

This investigative report is a public service message. Ashira and Zayne are abused children, and I have identified the abuser. Please help the children, rather than attacking me.

If you have first-hand information that I can vet for veracity, please engage and improve the situation for the Mast Family.

Brig, Soren and Reidar-

You are already old enough to be accused by a liar- even young girls, and they will ruin your life. Beware of them. Love Papa.