Author: papa

Categories
Uncategorized

French Education

Good information you have to search for, and read below. The information given to you at school is poison.

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

​​

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

​​​

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

​​

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

​​

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

​​

​​

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

​​

​​

​​

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

RADIO

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

​​

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

DOCUMENTARY

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

​​

”  Islamogauchisme, the betrayal of the European dream  “  – a film written and directed by Yves Azeroual

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

“This film is dedicated to #SamuelPaty and to all the victims of Islamist terrorism. “

Why and how did a handful of intellectuals and politicians from the left and the far left, few in number but very influential in the media and in the human rights movement, imposed a veritable sanctuary of Islam in French political space to the point of becoming complacent with Islamism in the name of #PasDAmalgame? Why these intellectuals and these politicians, for the most part agnostics and libertarians, have they sunk into #IslamoGauchisme with its victim ideology and its culture of excuse? 

In his shocking documentary, Yves Azéroual identifies the roots of evil, points to the troubled actions of political, media, associative and intellectual figures, ideological complicity, and, in fine, highlights the risks, for our European democracy, of seeing the political and radical Islam prevail to the detriment of Enlightenment Islam. In a disturbing face to face with the extreme right. 

Speakers:  Jean-Luc BENNHAMIAS; Jean BIRNBAUM; Zorah BITTAN; Christophe BOURSEILLER; Laurent BOUVET; Pascal BRUCKNER; Jean-François COLOSIMO; Raphaël ENTHOVEN; Caroline FOUREST; Jacques JULLIARD; Djorje KUZMANOVIC; Christophe MADROLLE; Céline PINA; François PUPPONI; Mohamed SIFAOUI; Dany TROM; Philippe VAL; Judith WAINTRAUB; Marc WEITZMANN;

Yves Azeroual is a journalist, essayist, novelist, creator of several television channels including TV and programs including “Secrets d’Histoire”. He wrote and directed around fifteen documentaries.

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

ABROAD

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

​​

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

  • UNITED KINGDOM:  “Radical: my Journey Out Of Islamic Extremism” , Maajid Nawaz: 

In the book by Michele Tribalat, “Assimilation, the end of the French model” (Editions Toucan, 2013) (statement here ) , the epilogue, titled “The Deer Hunter: the story of a repentant Islamist” , is a review of Maajid Nawaz’s book “Radical: my Journey Out Of Islamic Extremism” (not translated into French), published in 2013 in the United Kingdom but not translated into French and which recounts with great honesty what led to the recruitment of the author by an Islamist movement, Hizb al-Tahir (HT) , the liberation party. Maajid Nawaz founded a think tank, Quilliam , oriented towards the fight against extremism.

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

Extract this epilogue: “The university does not know on which foot to dance with these protesting Muslims who want to found a union, which initially aims to seize power from the Salafists. The methods of the HT consist in wrapping their political discourse in a religious and multiculturalist wrapping in order to circumvent criticism and opposition: “unlike the student protests of the 1960s, by using religion and multiculturalism as a cover we brought an entirely new lexicon on Table. We knowingly present our political demands in the guise of religion and multiculturalism and label any objection to our demands as racist or intolerant. Worse, we were doing this with the generation that sympathized with socialism in their youth. […] On Form, we called ourselves Gladstone, Disraéli and parliamentary debates. We managed to trick the leaders into letting us install what was just a cover for the HT. “Maajid Nawaz compares his organization’s project to that of communism, with the advantage of the confusing religious dress:” because it was hidden behind religious dress, no one really knew what to do and people did not know what to do. above all did not want to offend ”a religious sensibility. The moral disarmament of institutions has therefore left the HT free to act as it pleases on British campuses. This strategy was served by a left committed to multiculturalism and which treated this movement as an ordinary “target population”. Today very critical of this positioning of the British left, Maajid Nawaz uses the analogy with the BNP (British National Party). If the latter had tried to take power on the campuses, the left would have mobilized and would have cried scandal. According to him, the only ones who saw clearly the danger of movements such as the HT were the Jewish Student Union and gay rights activist Peter Tatchell. They were not heard and the HT continued to thrive. “

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

Categories
Uncategorized

is this what you want?

The news media wants more feminism. Your mother wants more feminism. Your teachers want more feminism.

Read, and tell if this is what you want?

Why Andrea Dworkin is the radical, visionary feminist we need in our terrible times

She was labelled a man-hater, anti-sex and ugly. But she predicted both the ascent of Trump and #MeToo – and her unapologetic attitude is more relevant than ever

Andrea Dworkin … prophetic

‘I can’t come here as a friend, even though I might very much want to.” These are the words of Andrea Dworkin, addressing an anti-sexist men’s organisation in 1983, in her acclaimed speech I Want a 24-Hour Truce in Which There Is No Rape. “The power exercised by men, day to day, in life is power that is institutionalised. It is protected by law. It is protected by religion and religious practice. It is protected by universities, which are strongholds of male supremacy. It is protected by a police force. It is protected by those whom Shelley called “the unacknowledged legislators of the world”: the poets, the artists. Against that power, we have silence.”

Dworkin, who died of heart failure in 2005 at the age of 58, was one of the world’s most notorious radical feminists. She wrote 14 books, the most famous of which was Pornography: Men Possessing Women (1981). Now her work is being revisited in Last Days at Hot Slit, a new collection of her writing.

Many of the articles written about her claimed Dworkin personified hate. The media often said she hated men, hated sex, hated sexual freedom and absolutely hated the left. In 1998, a writer in the London Review of Books saw fit to give his view on her appearance (“overweight and ugly”) and how her “frustration” at not having enough sex “has turned her into a man-hater”. Another wrote after her death that Dworkin was a “sad ghost” that feminism needs to exorcise and that she was “insane”.Andrea Dworkin, embattled feminist, dies at 58Read more

I knew the real Dworkin, and our decade-long friendship taught me far more about love than hate. “I keep the stories of the women in my heart,” she would tell me when I asked how she did the work she did and stayed sane. “They urge me on, and keep me focused on what needs to be done.”

She was motivated by an innate desire to rid the world of pain and oppression. Had more of us listened to Dworkin during her decades of activism, and taken her work more seriously, more women would have signed up to an uncompromising feminism, as opposed to the fun kind, the sloganeering sort you read on high-street T-shirts, that is all about individual “girl power” and being able to wear trousers, rather than a collective movement to emancipate all women from the tyranny of oppression.

We met in 1996. I was one of the organisers of an international conference on violence against women, and Dworkin was a keynote speaker. We hit it off immediately, as we had a similar sense of humour and a number of friends in common. A group of conference speakers went to dinner on the first night and we were raucously discussing our various wishlists of ways to end patriarchy. “Did you notice that we were ‘ladies’ when we came in, ‘guys’ when our order was taken,” said Dworkin the following morning, “and probably banned for life by the time we left?”

Feminist writer Andrea Dworkin.
Feminist writer Andrea Dworkin. Photograph: Jodi Buren/The Life Images Collection/Getty Images

In the early 1970s, Dworkin spoke of her own experiences of sexual abuse and violence at a time when few did. And in today’s climate of #MeToo revelations, we can see how far ahead of her time she was. “In the 1980s and 1990s, reading Dworkin became, for many, a discomfiting and exhilarating collegiate rite of passage,” reads a recent piece in the New York Times. “Her writing is a strident and raw look at the systemic bias affecting the everyday experiences of women.”

Dworkin’s 1983 book, Right-Wing Women, could have been about how Trump came to power. Although I doubt she would have been so quick to lay the bulk of the blame for Trump’s election on white women, her razor-sharp analysis of why so many women are attracted to a politics that despises their rights is more relevant today than ever. Her central theory is that the right exploits women’s fear and offers us a chivalrous protection. It reassures us that we do not need to change the status quo, but accept it, and take whatever access to power is available to us. Dworkin despaired at what has come to be known as “lean-in feminism” which focuses on the ability of individual, privileged women to climb to the top, and always said that until women at the “bottom of the pile” were liberated, none of us could be.

How refreshing her style of speaking and writing – intoxicating and unapologetic – is compared with the “fun-feminist” prose we see so often on modern bookshelves. Much of this writing focuses on self-help for disgruntled individuals, such as Caitlin Moran’s How to Be a Woman, which concentrates on laughing at sexism and having lots of larks. This, Dworkin would have said, is just another distraction from how women live “inside a system of humiliation from which there is no escape”.

We are living in terrible times for women. Thankfully, our resistance to the global pandemic of sexual and domestic violence is growing. But this resistance is being curtailed by a concerted attempt to silence women – just look at the inexorable rise of non-disclosure agreements to gag women speaking out about discrimination or harassment.

Dworkin would never be silenced. Reading her piece Dear Bill and Hillary, published in this newspaper in 1998, makes me wonder how we could not have seen that a man like Donald Trump would end up in power, and that sexual abuse scandals would dominate the media.

The new pornography is a vast graveyard where the left has gone to die. The left cannot have its whores and its politics, too.”

Andrea Dworkin

Decades ago, Dworkin spoke out vociferously against liberal feminists who defended Clinton against allegations of sexual abuse and misconduct simply because he claimed to support the US anti-violence-against-women movement. “Male politicians’ policies in respect of women are important, but sexual harassment is an issue, too. You don’t say it’s OK for the leader of your country to be having his cock sucked, by someone half his age, while he is in the people’s house,” she wrote. “I care about how men in public life treat women.” How prophetic that is when 20 years later we have a president who talks openly about how his fame means he can “do anything” to women – even “grab them by the pussy”.

And then there is the thorny issue of pornography. Alongside the legal scholar and feminist author Catherine MacKinnon, in 1983 Dworkin came up with the Dworkin-MacKinnon Anti-Pornography Civil Rights Ordinance, which would have given those directly harmed by pornography a right to civil recourse, enabling the victims to sue porn producers and distributors. The inspiration for the approach was Linda Lovelace, the star of Deep Throat, who had announced that she had been forced into making the film and raped during its production.

The ordinance, while supported by anti-pornography feminists in the US, UK and elsewhere, proved generally unpopular and eventually died a death. But, says the anti-porn author Gail Dines: “Dworkin’s work takes on greater significance in light of the #MeToo movement, which has made visible the routine sexual violence that has long been kept under wraps … [It] was more accurate than even she could have known: the dominant culture still avoids facing the reality of pornography’s role in making men’s sexual domination of women ‘hot’.”

Dworkin was the first second-wave feminist to write in detail about how beauty practices both came from and feed into women’s oppression. “Plucking the eyebrows, shaving under the arms … learning to walk in high-heeled shoes,” she wrote in Woman Hating, “having one’s nose fixed, straightening or curling one’s hair – these things hurt. The pain, of course, teaches an important lesson: no price is too great, no process too repulsive, no operation too painful for the woman who would be beautiful.”

So-called feminist pornographers are a fairly recent phenomenon, but Dworkin would have had no patience with the notion that porn could be made in an ethical way. I imagine she would have seen it much like the leftist arguments that porn should be protected as “free speech”. “The new pornography is a vast graveyard where the left has gone to die,” she once said. “The left cannot have its whores and its politics, too.”

Media critic … Andrea Dworkin.
Media critic … Andrea Dworkin. Photograph: Bettmann/Bettmann Archive

Months before she died, I introduced Dworkin to some Guardian editors, as she was becoming increasingly distressed by being unable to get her work published in the US. One of the pieces commissioned as a result of that meeting was about living with pain and disability. In the last email I received from Dworkin, she told me how positive her experience was dealing with those who recognised her worth. “I have never – I mean never – had the experience of editors I work with treating me with this kind of respect. I appreciate it so much.”

Dworkin was sadly prophetic about heterosexuality. The campaigner Caroline Criado-Perez (described recently as “the acceptable face of feminism”) cited Dworkin’s analysis of sexual relations between men and women. “There is a brilliant Dworkin quote about this,” she said. “Women are the only … group that shares a bed with their oppressor.”

In 1988, Dworkin was widely pilloried for describing sexual intercourse as “mandatory”, arguing that men claim an inalienable right to penetrate women during sex, and that this is one of the tools of patriarchy. Just last month, however, during a case in the high court, a judge was asked to consider imposing an order preventing a man from having sex with his wife because she now lacked the mental capacity to give consent. He said: “I cannot think of any more obviously fundamental human right than the right of a man to have sex with his wife.”

We had many a conversation about her earlier life. Although admirable, it always made me feel sad that Dworkin felt she owed such a debt of gratitude to the women’s movement, because feminists had helped her in her early days to escape a very violent marriage. Although I kept it from her, some feminists were deeply unkind about Dworkin, with one high-profile writer once telling me: “Andrea does the movement no favours – she’s a loose cannon and looks awful.”

The visceral hatred towards Dworkin acted as a warning to women not to engage with a radical type of feminism. However, we need it more than ever right now. Rape convictions are as rare as hen’s teeth; revenge porn is a daily reality for many women and girls; and trafficking of women into the sex trade is endemic. One investigation into major pimping gangs in England found that police were happy to blame the victims for their fate. The soft feminism most prevalent today is inadequate for the climate of misogyny that women are being forced to endure. The focus, particularly of young and university-based women, on individual identity and lifestyle choice will not withstand the onslaught of the men’s rights movement.

The truth about Dworkin is everywhere, but so is the distortion of her work and of her politics. In 1998, I visited Dworkin in her Brooklyn home. We were talking about the latest attack on her by pro-pornography feminists, which had clearly upset her. “I have a feeling that after my death I might be finally understood.” I asked what she meant. She did not expand.

Our lengthy conversations, which I miss more with every passing year, would be full of laughter and passion, but always with the cloud of impending doom hovering. Dworkin got it so right when she told me, only months before she died: “Women will come back to feminism, because things are going to get far, far worse for us before they get better.”

Categories
Uncategorized

Bon Annee

• See failure as a beginning.
• Never stop learning.
• Assume nothing, question everything.
• Teach others what you know.
• Analyze objectively.
• Practice humility.
• Respect constructive criticism.
• Take initiative.
• Give credit where it’s due.
• Love what you do.

Love You- PAPA PAPA PAPA PAPA

Categories
Uncategorized

Ici -Here

I am always here for you. I support you, I love you. I will cross the ends of the earth for you. It is not your fault this happened to your mother.

Listen to Ryan Thomas talk about how he dealt with an alienating parent. He survived, and so can you. #BeBrave.

Love Papa.

Categories
Uncategorized

The End

Brig, Soren and Reidar-

There are consequences for choices. Our moments together as a family, our moments of joy, our moments of learning, our moments of laughter have been irrevocably taken by a single human being. Your mother.

We will make lemonade out of rest of your moment together, but the suffering can never be erased. Actions have consequences.

I love you- PAPA.

always supporting you, missing you and loving you.

Categories
Uncategorized

Moral Failure

People fail spectacularly, and Nations fail spectacularly. The cause is always the same- Moral Decay.

Contrary to today’s narrative Democracy does not protect your life or your family. Only Restrictions on political power protect your life and your freedoms. Read this interesting paper on the collapse of Nation States.

The Moral decay in France is so obvious, it smells like rotten meat.

I am always here for you, defending you. supporting you. Love Papa.

Vivre la PutnamBoys!!!

Categories
Uncategorized

Liberte, Liberte, Liberte

Not everyone in France is a sheep. Boys, stand up to the mob. The French law prohibiting the filming of Police has been repealed- at least for a moment- due to people demanding liberte. Demand your own liberte.

Love Papa

Categories
Uncategorized

Overvalued

New Swedish study: merits of recently appointed female professors massively overvalued

by ACADEMIC RIGHTS WATCH posted on 2020-04-03

On the popular view, there are fewer female than male professors because women’s qualifications weigh lighter than men’s. Yet, according to a striking new study from Umeå University in Sweden the situation is very much the opposite: in the period 2009-2014, new male professors in medicine had 64 percent more publications and no less than 260 percent more citations than new female professors. The study was rejected by five journals without refereeing for being considered, among other things, “inappropriate”, until it was finally published after peer-review in the journal Studies in Higher Education.

Despite several decades of active so-called gender equality work, only 27 percent of Sweden’s professors are women. This perceived political failure has motivated the Swedish feminist government to introduce increasingly draconic policies on state universities to counter what it sees as systematic discrimination of women at the professorial level.

In an article recently published in Studies in Higher Education , Guy Madison, a professor of psychology at Umeå University, and Pontus Fahlman examined the usual explanation that women’s academic performance is valued less than men’s. To measure the magnitude of the expected discrimination, they compared the merits of those who became professors between 2009 and 2014 at the six largest Swedish universities (Gothenburg, Lund, Stockholm, Uppsala, Umeå and the Karolinska Institute).

“The number of publications and how many times they are cited are central when assessing scientific competence. Thus, if women are disadvantaged in the appointment of professors, they should have more publications than men among all appointed professors. We saw the opposite,” says Guy Madison in a press release from Umeå University. The researchers found that newly appointed male professors had 64 percent more publications and no less than 260 percent more citations in medicine than newly appointed female professors. In the social sciences, men had 81 percent more publications and 42 percent more citations (law, linguistics, pedagogy, psychology and political science).

Contrary to what the researchers predicted, the threshold has effectively been lower for women between 2009 and 2014, which coincides with a much larger increase in the number of female professors (78 percent) than male professors (28 percent). “Possible explanations could be the application of the principle of always choosing from under-represented gender if differences in qualifications are small, or some other form of discrimination to meet the government’s goal of rapidly increasing the proportion of female professors,” says Guy Madison.

Academic Rights Watch (ARW) has documented numerous cases of discrimination against males in Swedish academia. In a recent post on our international homepage, we revealed that a Swedish technical university systematically cancels positions if a male applicant is judged most competent. Previously, we have documented how male applicants are excluded from professorships at Stockholm University for Arts, Crafts and Design for producing “macho art” or for failing to exercise “norm criticism” (criticism of masculine norms) in their work. Many other cases can be found on our Swedish website, which features a translation function.

The results of the Umeå study are in line with a previous bibliometrical study, which found that, on average, male researchers are much more productive 10 years after their PhD than their female counterparts, but also that there is considerable variation in the relative performance between men and women in different academic subjects. The Umeå article was rejected by several journals without any referee reports. In the acknowledgement section, the authors comment on what they see as a certain lack of appreciation for their conclusions among journal editors and some referees:

The reason that this article is published more than three years since the data collection is the cumulative duration of the review process, at it has been rejected by six journals before it was submitted to Studies in Higher Education. Five of them eventually rejected it without review, stating that it was inappropriate for, or outside the scope of, the journal. One journal rejected it after a first round of reviews, where each of reviewers 1–4 provided increasingly negative and unspecific comments.

Categories
Uncategorized

France Manifesto

Brig, Soren and Reidar- Join me and the other 100+ signatories to this manifesto. Instead, if you don’t sign, then you are compling with the banning of islamic information (such as policies at Ecolint or la cote, and opendemocracy). Each of these institutions wants to destroy men, liberal society and freedom for an individual person. They are your enemy, they are not neutral.

Standing with you. Love Papa. #BeBrave #liesdestroylives

Collective

In a forum in the “World”, professors and researchers of various sensibilities denounce the reluctance of many of their peers on Islamism and “indigenist, racialist and decolonial ideologies”, supporting the words of Jean-Michel Blanquer on “l ‘Islamo-leftism’.

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

A few days after the assassination of Samuel Paty, the main reaction of the institution which is supposed to represent French universities, the Conference of University Presidents (CPU), is to “share the emotion aroused” by comments by Jean-Michel Blanquer on Europe 1 and in the Senate on October 22. The Minister of National Education had noted on Europe 1 that “Islamo-leftism is wreaking havoc at the university” , in particular “when an organization like the UNEF gives in to this type of thing” . He denounced an “ideology” which “leads to the worst” , noting that the murderer was ““ideas which often come from elsewhere” , the “communitarianism” which are responsible: “the fish rots by the head” .

And in the Senate, the same day, Jean-Michel Blanquer confirmed that there are “very powerful Islamo-leftist currents in the sectors of higher education which are damaging people’s minds. And this leads to certain problems, that you are seeing “ .

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

We, academics and researchers, can only give us with this observation of Jean Michel Blanquer.

Who could deny the gravity of the situation today in France, especially after the recent Nice attack – a situation which, whatever some people claim, does not spare our universities? Indigenist, racialist and “decolonial” ideologies (transferred from North American campuses) are very present there, fueling a hatred of “whites” and of France; and a sometimes violent militancy attacks those who still dare to defy the anti-Western doxa and the multiculturalist prech-preached. Houria Bouteldja was thus able to congratulate herself at the beginning of October that her decolonial party, the Native Party of the Republic (of which she is the spokesperson) “shines in all the universities” .

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

The reluctance of most universities and associations of university specialists to designate Islamism as responsible for the assassination of Samuel Paty is an illustration of this: their press releases only refer to “obscurantism” or “fanaticism”. “ .

As the wearing of the veil – among other symptoms – has multiplied in recent years, it is time to name things and also to realize the responsibility, in the current situation, for ideologies that have arisen and spread. in college and beyond. The importation of Anglo-Saxon communitarian ideologies, intellectual conformism, fear and political correctness are a real threat to our universities. Freedom of speech tends to be drastically restricted, as recently witnessed by numerous censorship cases by pressure groups.

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

What threatens us are not the words of Jean-Michel Blanquer, who should on the contrary be congratulated for having become aware of the seriousness of the situation: it is the persistence of denial. The CPU says in its press release that “research is not responsible for the ills of society, it analyzes them” . We do not agree: ideas have consequences and universities also have an essential role to play in the struggle for the defense of secularism and freedom of expression. 

We are therefore surprised by the long silence of Frédérique Vidal, the Minister of Higher Education, Research and Innovation, who only intervened on October 26 to make sure that everything was going well in the universities. 

But that does not mean that we are reassured. We therefore ask the Minister of Higher Education, Research and Innovation to put in place measures to detect Islamist abuses, to take a clear stand against the ideologies that underlie them, and to engage our universities in this fight for secularism and the Republic by creating a body responsible for directly reporting cases of attacks on republican principles and academic freedom, and developing a guide to appropriate responses, as was done for the ‘National Education.

signatories 

Daniel Aberdam , Research Director at INSERM  – Jocelyn Achard , University Professor –  Francis Affergan , University Professor Emeritus  – Alya Aglan , University Professor – Jean-François Agnèse , IRD Research Director – Michel Albouy , University Professor Emeritus – Joëlle Allouche-Benayoun , CNRS researcher –  Éric Anceau , HDR lecturer – Valérie Andrieu , HDR lecturer –  Julie d’Andurain , University professor – Sophie Archambault de Beaune , University professor – Matthieu Arnold , University professor – Roland Assaraf , CNRS researcher – Philippe Avril , University professor emeritus – Fabrice Balanche , lecturer – Anne-Marie Baranowski , honorary university professor – Isabelle Barbéris , HDR lecturer –  Clarisse Bardiot , HDR lecturer – Dominique Barjot , professor emeritus of the Universities – Patrick Barrau , honorary lecturer  – Christian Bassac , honorary professor of the Universities – Myriam Benarroch , lecturer –Martine Benoit , University professor –  Wladimir Berelowitsch , director of studies at EHESS –  Florence Bergeaud-Blackler , research fellow at CNRS – Maurice Berger , former associate professor – Thibaut de Berranger , senior lecturer – HDR  Gilles Bertheau , senior of HDR lectures –  Marc Bied-Charrenton , professor emeritus of the Universities – Andreas Bikfalvi , professor of the Universities – Jacques Billard , honorary lecturer – Jean-Cassien Billier , lecturer –  Alain Blanchet , professor emeritus of the Universities –Guillaume Bonnet , university professor – Catherine Bore ,  Honorary University Professor – Yves Bottineau-Fuchs , Honorary University Professor – Michel Bourdeau , emeritus director of research at CNRS –  Laurent Bouvet , university professor –  Rémi Brague , Professor of Universities – Joaquim Brandão de Carvalho , University professor –  Jean-François Braunstein , University professor – Christian Brechot , University professor emeritus – Stéphane Breton , Director of studies at EHESS – Jean-Marie Brohm, Professor Emeritus of the Universities – Michelle-Irène Brudny , Honorary Professor of the Universities – Patrick Cabanel , Director of Studies, Practical School of Advanced Studies – Christian Cambillau , Director of Research Emeritus at the CNRS – Belinda Cannone , Senior Lecturer – Nicolas Carrier , University professor – Dominique Casajus , emeritus research director at CNRS – Sylvie Catellin , lecturer – Jean-Marc Chadelat , HDR lecturer – Brigitte Chapelain , lecturer –  Jean-François Chappuit , lecturer – Blandine Chelini-Pont , university professor – François Cochet , emeritus university professor – Genevieve Cohen-Cheminet , university professor – Norbert Col , Professor  of  Universities  – Laurent Collet , University Professor – Jacqueline Costa-Lascoux , research director at the CNRS – Laurent Coste , university professor – Cécile Cottenceau , PRAG University – Gilles Courtieu , senior lecturer – Charles Coutel , university professor, vice-president of the Committee Laïcité République – Philippe Crignon, lecturer – David Cumin , lecturer HDR – Jean-Claude Daumas , professor emeritus of the Universities –  Daniel Dayan , director of research at the CNRS –  Chantal Delsol , member of the Academy of moral and political sciences – Gilles Denis , lecturer of conferences HDR – Geneviève Dermenjian , lecturer HDR – Marie-Laurence Desclos , professor emeritus of the Universities – Albert Doja , professor of the Universities – Catherine Douay , professor of the Universities – Michel Dreyfus , Director of research at the CNRS – Alain Ehrenberg , director emeritus of research at CNRS – Marie-Claude Esposito , professor emeritus of Universities – Jean-Louis Fabiani , director of studies at EHESS –  Jeanne Favret-Saada , honorary director of studies at EPHE –  Laurent Fedi , lecturer –  Rémi Ferrand , lecturer –  Luc Ferry , former Minister of National Education –  Michel Fichant , professor emeritus of the Universities – Jean Fichot , lecturer –  Mathieu Flonneau , lecturer – Dominique Folscheid , professor emeritus of Universities – Nicole Fouché, CNRS-EHESS researcher –  Annie Fourcaut , University professor – Jean-Marc Franconi , HDR lecturer – Renée Fregosi , retired HDR lecturer – Pierre Fresnault-Deruelle , University professor emeritus – Marc Fryd , HDR lecturer – Edith Fuchs , Honorary Lecturer –  Alexandre Gady , University Professor –  Jean-Claude Galey , Director of Studies at EHESS –  Marcel Gauchet , Director of Studies at EHESS – Béatrice Giblin , Professor Emeritus of Universities – Christian Gilain, professor emeritus of Universities –  Jacques-Alain Gilbert , professor of Universities –  Gabriel Gras , research fellow at CEA –  Yana Grinshpun , senior lecturer –  Patrice Gueniffey , director of studies at EHESS –  Éric Guichard , senior lecturer HDR – Jean-Marc Guislin , Professor Emeritus of Universities –  Charles Guittard , Professor of Universities –  Philippe Gumplowicz , Professor of Universities –  Claude Habib , Emeritus Professor of Universities – François Heilbronn , Professor of Universities associated with Sciences-Po – Nathalie Heinich, research director at CNRS – Emmanuelle Hénin , university professor – Marc Hersant , university professor –  Philippe d’Iribarne , research director at CNRS – François Jacob , associate professor of universities – François Jost , professor emeritus of universities – Olivier Jouanjan , Professor of Universities –  Pierre Jourde , Emeritus Professor of Universities –  Gilles Kepel , Professor of Universities – Jean-Charles Khalifa , Senior Lecturer – Catherine Kintzler , Honorary Professor of Universities –  Marcel Kuntz, research director at CNRS – Bernard Labatut , HDR lecturer – Pierre Camille Lacaze , University professor emeritus – Monique Lambert , University professor – Frédérique de La Morena , lecturer –  Philippe de Lara , HDR lecturer –  Philippe Larralde , PRAG University – Emmanuel Leclercq , Associate Professor  of Universities  – Dominique Legallois , Professor of Universities – Anne Lemonde , Senior Lecturer –  Anne-Marie Le Pourhiet , Professor of Universities – Andrée Lerousseau, lecturer – Franck Lessay , professor emeritus of Universities – Marc Levilly , associate lecturer – Carlos Levy , professor emeritus of Universities – Robert Lévy , honorary professor  , superior chair of Paris  – Roger Lewandowski , professor of Universities –  Philippe Liger- Belair , lecturer –  Laurent Loty , researcher at the CNRS –  Catherine Louveau , professor emeritus of the Universities – Jean-Marie Maguin , professor emeritus of the Universities – Catherine Maire , historian and researcher at the CNRS – Danièle Manesse , Professor Emeritus of Universities –  Jean-Louis Margolin , Senior Lecturer – Jean Marieu  Honorary Professor of Universities – Joseph Martinetti , Lecturer – Gabriel Martinez-Gros , Emeritus Professor of Universities – Céline Masson , Professor of Universities –  Jean- Yves Masson , University professor –  Eric Maulin , University professor –  Samuel Mayol , lecturer –  Isabelle de Mecquenem , PRAG University – Ferdinand Mélin-Soucramanien , University professor – Mary Magdalene Mervant Roux , emeritus director of research at CNRS – Marc Michel , emeritus university professor – Jean-Baptiste Minnaert , University Professor  – Pierre Morere , Honorary University Professor – Nathalie Mourgues , emeritus university professor  – Frank Muller , professor emeritus of Universities – Lion Murard , associate researcher at CERMES –  Franck Neveu , professor of Universities – Jean-Pierre Nioche , professor emeritus at HEC – Pierre Nora , member of the French Academy – Jean-Max Noyer, professor emeritus of Universities – Dominique Ottavi , professor emeritus of Universities – Bruno Ollivier , professor of Universities, associate researcher at CNRS – Gilles Pages , director of research at INSERM – Hélène  Palma , lecturer – Rémi Pellet , professor of Universities – Marc Perelman , university professor – Pascal Perrineau , university professor –  Laetitia Petit , university lecturer –  Jean Petitot , director of studies at EHESS – Béatrice Picon-Vallin , research director at CNRS – René Pommier, lecturer –  Dominique Pradelle , university professor – Joël Priolon , senior  lecturer – André Quaderi, university professor –  Gérard Rabinovitch , associate researcher at CNRS-CRPMS –  Charles Ramond , university professor –  Jean-Jacques Rassial , professor emeritus of Universities –  François Rastier , Director of Research at CNRS –  Philippe Raynaud , Emeritus Professor of Universities – Catherine Resche , Emeritus Professor of Universities –  Catherine Regnault-Roger , Emeritus Professor of Universities –   Cécile Révauger , Professor Emeritus of Universities –   Jean-Paul Revauger, Professor Emeritus of Universities –  Dominique Reynié , Professor of Universities – Serge Ricard , Professor Emeritus of Universities – Virginia Ricard , Senior Lecturer  – Isabelle Rivoal , Director of Research at CNRS – Jean -Jacques Roche , University professor – Pierre Rochette , University professor – Marc Rolland , University professor – Jean-Paul Rosaye , University professor –  Danièle Rosenfeld-Katz , lecturer – Bernard Rougier , University professor – Daniel Roulland , University professor emeritus – Andrée Rousseau , lecturer – Jean-Michel Roy , University professor – François de Saint-Chéron , HDR lecturer –  Jacques de Saint-Victor , professor of Universities –   Xavier-Laurent Salvador , HDR lecturer – Jean-Baptiste Santamaria , lecturer –  Yves Santamaria , lecturer –  Georges-Elia Sarfati , University professor –  Jean-Pierre Schandeler , researcher at CNRS – Pierre Schapira , University Professor Emeritus – Etienne Schneider , PRAG University – Martine Segalen , University Professor Emeritus – Jean-Paul Sermain , University Professor Emeritus –  Francis Simonis , HDR Lecturer –  Perrine Simon-Nahum , Research Director at CNRS – Antoine Spire , associate professor at the University –  Claire Squires , lecturer – Bruno Sire , professor emeritus of the Universities – Isabelle Starkier , lecturer – Marcel Staroswiecki , honorary professor of the Universities –Wiktor Stoczkowski , director of studies at EHESS –  Jean Szlamowicz , professor of Universities –  Pierre-André Taguieff , director of research at CNRS – Jean-Christophe Tainturier , PRAG University – Jacques Tarnero , researcher at the Cité des sciences et de l industry –  Michele Tauber , lecturer HDR –  Pierre-Henri Tavoillot , lecturer HDR –  Alain Tedgui , emeritus research director at INSERM –  Thibault Tellier , University Professor – Françoise Thom , lecturer HDR – Andre Tiran, teacher Emeritus of Universities – Antoine Triller , Emeritus Research Director at INSERM – Frédéric Tristram , Senior Lecturer HDR – Sylvie Toscer-Angot , Senior Lecturer – Vincent Tournier , Senior Lecturer – Christophe Tournu , Professor of Universities – Serge Valdinoci , lecturer – Alberto Verga , university professor – Raymonde Vatinet , university professor – Gisèle Venet , university professor emeritus – François Vergne , lecturer – Gilles Vergnon , senior lecturer HDR – Martine Verlhac , Honorary Professor  , Annecy Superior Chair  –  Pierre Vermeren , University Professor – Marie-Claude Vettraino-Soulard , Honorary University Professor – Yves Visetti , Emeritus Research Director at CNRS – Elodie Weber , Senior Lecturer – Nicolas Weill -Parot , Director of Studies at EPHE –  Yves Charles Zarka , Professor Emeritus of Universities –  Paul Zawadzki , Senior Lecturer HDR –  Françoise Zonabend , Director of Studies at EHESS – Anne Zribi-Hertz , Professor Emeritus of Universities – Patrick Zylberman, professor  emeritus  of the Universities. 

To date, 253 academics and researchers have signed the Manifesto of 100.

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

In addition to this, you need to know more about it.

Academics and researchers wishing to sign this manifesto can do so by sending an email to the contact address below.  

Categories
Uncategorized

Xmas Presents